ISSN: 3105-7888 mse.journal@ksph.kz

Ауыл тұрғындарына көрсетілетін амбулаториялық медициналық көмекті жетілдіру. Әдебиетке шолу

Review article Қоғамдық денсаулық сақтау

Ауыл тұрғындарына көрсетілетін амбулаториялық медициналық көмекті жетілдіру. Әдебиетке шолу

ӘОЖ: 614.2 DOI: 10.24412/1609-8692-2025-3-68-75 Беттер: 106-114 180

Аннотация

Кіріспе. Ауыл тұрғындарына амбулаториялық медициналық көмек көрсету Қазақстанның денсаулық сақтау жүйесіндегі басым бағыттардың бірі болып табылады. Ел халқының шамамен 38%-ы ауылдық жерде тұрады, ал бастапқы медициналық көмекке қолжетімділікке кадр тапшылығы, инфрақұрылымның жеткіліксіздігі және көлік қиындықтары әсер етеді.
Мақсаты. Ауыл тұрғындарына амбулаториялық медициналық көмекті жетілдіру бойынша халықаралық және қазақстандық тәжірибені жинақтау және көмектің қолжетімділігі мен сапасын арттыра алатын ұйымдастырушылық тәсілдерді айқындау.
Материалдар мен әдістер. Бастапқы қолжазбада келтірілген 20 дереккөз негізінде құрылымдалған нарративтік шолу жүргізілді. Талдауға Қытай, Үндістан, Нигерия және Қазақстандағы ауылдық денсаулық сақтауды сипаттайтын ресми статистикалық және бағдарламалық материалдар, халықаралық есептер, рецензияланатын жарияланымдар және интернет-ресурстар енгізілді. Бастапқы материалда қайталанатын іздеу стратегиясы, іздеу күндері, формалды енгізу және шығару критерийлері және жүйелі қателік тәуекелін бағалау көрсетілмегендіктен, жұмыс жүйелі емес, нарративтік шолу ретінде жіктелді.
Нәтижелер. Талдау ауылдық медицинаны дамытудың негізгі бағыттарына кадрлық ынталандыру, қоғамдастық денсаулық сақтау қызметкерлерін тарту, мобильді медициналық қызметтер, телемедицина, инфрақұрылымды жаңарту және профилактикалық бағдарламалар жататынын көрсетті. Қазақстанда 2023 жылы ауыл тұрғындарының медициналық ұйымдарға жүгіну саны 128,4 млн-ға жетті, амбулаториялық деңгейде 324 млн-нан астам қызмет көрсетілді, мобильді кешендер мен медициналық пойыздар арқылы 1,3 млн-нан астам адам қамтылды, 388 мың жаңа ауру анықталып, 220 мың адам медициналық бақылауға алынды. Ауылдық жерлерде жұмыс істейтін жас дәрігерлер саны 1 200-ден асты.
Талқылау. Ұлттық модельдер әртүрлі болғанымен, халықаралық тәжірибе ортақ практикалық басымдықтарды көрсетеді: жеткілікті кадрлық қамтамасыз ету, алғашқы көмектің аумақтық қолжетімділігі, қоғамдастықтағы профилактика, көлік және цифрлық қолжетімділік, сондай-ақ бақылаудың үздіксіздігі. Қазақстан үшін кадрлық, инфрақұрылымдық және көліктік шектеулер әлі де өзекті.
Қорытынды. Ауыл тұрғындарына амбулаториялық көмекті одан әрі жетілдіру инфрақұрылымды жаңартуды, медицина кадрларын қолдауды, мобильді және телемедициналық технологияларды дамытуды және тиімді халықаралық тәжірибені ұлттық жағдайларға бейімдеуді ұштастыруы тиіс.

Кілт сөздер:

Толық мәтін

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 40% of Kazakhstan's total population resides in rural areas [1]. Preserving the health of rural populations and ensuring access to medical care is one of the most pressing issues today. The quality and accessibility of medical services in rural regions often remain at a low level due to insufficient infrastructure, a shortage of medical personnel, and transportation difficulties.

For example, according to the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the shortage of doctors in rural areas reaches up to 30%, and residents have to travel an average of 15–20 kilometers to reach medical facilities [2].

Outpatient medical care is the primary level of healthcare services, providing disease prevention, early diagnosis, and consistent treatment. Therefore, improving the system of outpatient care for rural populations and increasing its efficiency is crucial for enhancing public health and ensuring equal access to medical services. Progress in this area will have a positive impact on the socio-economic development of rural regions [3].

The objective of this review was to summarize international and Kazakhstan experience in improving outpatient medical care for rural populations and to identify organizational approaches that may be adapted to strengthen accessibility, continuity, and quality of care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This article was prepared as a structured narrative review. The analytical material consisted of the 20 sources already included by the authors in the manuscript: official statistical and policy documents, international reports, peer-reviewed studies, institutional materials, and web resources concerning rural healthcare and outpatient service organization.

The review focused on four country contexts represented in the source material—China, India, Nigeria, and Kazakhstan. Information was grouped by the main organizational mechanisms used to improve rural access: healthcare workforce capacity, community-based personnel, mobile services, telemedicine, infrastructure, prevention, and follow-up.

A reproducible database search strategy, search dates, formal inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a risk-of-bias assessment were not documented in the source manuscript. No quantitative pooling was performed. Accordingly, the article should be interpreted as a structured narrative synthesis rather than a systematic review.

RESULTS

International approaches to improving rural outpatient care

In China, improving outpatient medical care in rural areas is a key focus in the healthcare sector. About 42.2% of the country’s doctors work in rural regions; however, the number of doctors per 1,000 people remains lower than in urban areas. In 2021, this figure was 2.42 doctors per 1,000 people in rural areas, compared to 3.73 in cities [4]. There are more than 599,000 clinics operating in rural areas, but only 21.4% of them meet established standards [5]. Moreover, 70% of rural doctors in China are over the age of 40, highlighting the issue of an aging workforce [6]. Only about 52% of rural residents have access to necessary medical services, whereas in urban areas this figure exceeds 80% [5]. The government is providing financial support to improve rural healthcare infrastructure. In addition, training programs are being organized to enhance the professional qualifications of doctors. Incentive measures are also in place to attract young specialists. All these efforts are aimed at improving the health of the rural population.

In India, over 900,000 community health workers are employed to improve the rural healthcare system [7]. The majority of them are specially trained women known as ASHA (Accredited Social Health Activist) workers. These professionals provide counseling on vaccination, maternal and child health, chronic diseases, and mental health issues. Approximately 65% of the rural population receives medical care through ASHA workers. In 2023, the infant mortality rate in rural areas was 28.3 per 1,000 live births, a significant decrease compared to the rate in 2010 [8]. This achievement is the result of preventive measures and active vaccination campaigns. Thanks to the efforts of ASHA workers, the rate of prenatal and postnatal care among women increased to 75%, access to primary healthcare rose by 17%, and institutional deliveries grew by 28% [9]. ASHA workers educate rural residents on managing chronic diseases and encourage them to undergo regular treatment. Special attention is given to preventing complications from conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. The government provides ASHA workers with an average annual bonus of around 300 US dollars. Since 2020, specialized mental health training has been conducted on a regular basis. By 2025, the Indian government plans to improve rural healthcare infrastructure by 30% and increase the number of ASHA workers by 20%.

In Nigeria, in 2009, a national program called the Midwives Service Scheme (MSS) was launched with the aim of reducing maternal and child mortality in rural areas. Under this program, about 2,500 midwives were deployed to remote rural regions of the country [10]. These midwives were placed in 652 primary healthcare centers and 163 district hospitals [11]. After the implementation of MSS in 2010, the level of antenatal care increased by an average of 12%, and overall utilization of healthcare services grew by 6% [12]. In 2008, the maternal mortality rate in Nigeria was 840 cases per 100,000 live births, which decreased to 576 cases per 100,000 live births by 2013 [13]. However, the rate of births attended by skilled healthcare workers did not change significantly and remained at a stable level [11].

Development of rural outpatient care in Kazakhstan

In Kazakhstan, in 2022, more than 67,000 medical workers were employed in rural areas, including 13,000 doctors and 54,000 mid-level specialists. The medical trains "Zhardem" and "Salamatty Kazakhstan" covered 147 stations and provided medical assistance to over 77,000 people, including 20,500 children. Additionally, as a result of preventive screenings, 838,000 people were examined, and more than 29,000 of them were diagnosed with hypertension, diabetes, or kidney problems [14]. Eighty-four percent of district hospitals are equipped with modern CT and X-ray equipment. In 2022, 72 new pharmacies and 161 private pharmacies were opened in rural areas [15]. Telemedicine and mobile medical complexes became widely accessible to rural residents (Prime Minister of Kazakhstan, 2023). As part of a national project launched in 2023, 309 primary healthcare centers were established, and 12 interdistrict hospitals were renovated. These measures have allowed the provision of specialized medical care to rural populations to increase to 2.4 million people [16]. These efforts to develop the healthcare system in rural Kazakhstan have significantly improved the accessibility and quality of medical services.


 

Table 1 - Dynamics of rural healthcare development in Kazakhstan in 2022–2023

Indicator

2022

2023

Change

Number of visits by rural residents to medical institutions

118.8 million (estimated)

128.4 million

+8.1%

Number of outpatient services

310 million (approximately)

324 million

+4.5%

People assisted through medical trains and mobile complexes

1.1 million (approximately)

1.3 million

+18%

Newly diagnosed diseases

350 thousand (approximately)

388 thousand

+10.9%

People under medical supervision

200 thousand (approximately)

220 thousand

+10%

Number of young doctors

1,000–1,100

1,200+

 +9–20%

Note. Values marked “estimated” or “approximately” are reproduced from the source manuscript.

 


Rural healthcare in Kazakhstan showed significant growth from 2022 to 2023. The number of visits by rural residents to medical institutions increased by 8.1%, reaching 128.4 million, indicating a growing demand for medical services. The total volume of outpatient services also rose by 4.5%, amounting to 324 million medical services provided [17]. The number of rural residents receiving assistance through medical trains and mobile complexes increased by 18%, reaching 1.3 million people. Additionally, screening results showed a 10.9% increase in newly diagnosed diseases, while the number of patients under medical supervision grew by 10% [18]. The recruitment of young doctors to rural areas also showed positive dynamics—their number exceeded 1,200, which is an important step toward strengthening the human resources capacity of rural healthcare. Overall, these indicators reflect improvements in the accessibility and quality of rural healthcare, as well as the implementation of effective measures to protect public health [19, 20].

DISCUSSION

In many countries around the world, ambulatory medical care in rural areas is one of the priority directions of the healthcare system. Each country implements systematic measures aimed at increasing the accessibility of medical services for the rural population, taking into account its specific circumstances. In China, important tasks include improving rural medical infrastructure, strengthening the workforce capacity, and attracting young specialists, while in India, preventive measures and public awareness through community health workers are widely developed. In Nigeria, the quality of medical care is improving thanks to national programs aimed at reducing maternal and child mortality.

Kazakhstan is also undertaking large-scale efforts to develop rural medicine. Modern technologies such as medical trains, mobile complexes, and telemedicine are being introduced, and systematic measures to attract young doctors to rural areas are being implemented. All these actions are aimed at improving the health of the rural population, ensuring equal access to medical services, and increasing the level of early detection and prevention of diseases.

Taken together, the reviewed approaches suggest that improvement in rural outpatient care is not dependent on a single intervention. Sustainable access requires simultaneous work on staffing, infrastructure, prevention, transport, digital technologies, and continuity of care. The Kazakhstan data presented in the article demonstrate positive dynamics in service utilization and outreach, but they should be interpreted primarily as indicators of system activity rather than as direct evidence of improved clinical outcomes.

Scientific novelty and practical significance

The scientific novelty of this review is integrative rather than experimental. The article brings together several organizational models of rural healthcare—physician-resource development in China, community health workers in India, the Midwives Service Scheme in Nigeria, and mobile, telemedicine, infrastructure, and workforce initiatives in Kazakhstan—and considers their relevance to strengthening outpatient care in the national context. Its practical value lies in identifying a set of mutually reinforcing directions that can be used when planning rural primary and outpatient healthcare services.

Limitations

The main limitations are the narrative design, the absence of a reproducible literature-search protocol and formal quality appraisal, the heterogeneity of the included evidence, and the use of several non-peer-reviewed web sources. Some indicators in Table 1 are presented as estimated or approximate values. These factors limit the possibility of drawing causal conclusions or directly comparing countries.

CONCLUSION

Nevertheless, to further improve the quality and accessibility of medical care in rural areas, important tasks remain, such as upgrading infrastructure, addressing workforce shortages, and improving transportation accessibility. In the future, sustainable development of this sector will only be possible through the introduction of innovations based on international experience, which will help preserve the health of rural residents and improve their quality of life. Thus, the improvement of the rural healthcare system remains an important factor in enhancing the well-being of society as a whole.

The reviewed international and Kazakhstan experience indicates that the most promising direction is a combined approach that links infrastructure modernization, workforce support, mobile and telemedicine services, preventive care, and adaptation of effective international practices to local conditions.

Әдебиеттер тізімі

  1. Бюро национальной статистики Республики Казахстан. Население и социально-экономические показатели в сельских районах Казахстана. Астана: Бюро национальной статистики Республики Казахстан; 2023.
  2. Министерство здравоохранения Республики Казахстан. Состояние и направления развития медицинских услуг в Казахстане. Алматы: Министерство здравоохранения Республики Казахстан; 2023.
  3. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Первичная медико-санитарная помощь и сельские медицинские службы: глобальный доклад. Женева: ВОЗ; 2022.
  4. Xiao Y, Zhang Z, Xu CM, Yu JY, Chen TT, Jia SW, et al. Evolution of physician resources in China (2003–2021): quantity, quality, structure, and geographic distribution. Hum Resour Health. 2025;23(1):15. doi:10.1186/s12960-025-00983-8.
  5. PeopleChina. China's healthcare system and rural medical institutions [Internet]. 2022. Available from: http://www.peoplechina.com.cn/China/202206/t20220614_800296843.html
  6. Li J, Lian T, Tian Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Wu M. Improving rural doctors' professional competence: effectiveness analysis of China's village doctors policy. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1591633. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591633.
  7. Wikipedia. Accredited Social Health Activist [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accredited_Social_Health_Activist
  8. National Health Mission. Infant mortality rate and institutional delivery incentives under ASHA [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Mission
  9. Agarwal S, Curtis SL, Angeles G, Speizer IS, Singh K, Thomas JC. The impact of India’s accredited social health activist (ASHA) program on the utilization of maternity services: a nationally representative longitudinal modelling study. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17:68. doi:10.1186/s12960-019-0402-4.
  10. Wikipedia. Midwives Service Scheme (Nigeria) [Internet]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwives_Service_Scheme
  11. Okeke EN, Glick P, Abubakar IS, Chari AV, Pitchforth E, Exley J, et al. The Better Obstetrics in Rural Nigeria (BORN) Study: an impact evaluation of the Nigerian Midwives Service Scheme. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2015.
  12. Okeke E, Glick P, Chari A, Abubakar IS, Pitchforth E, Exley J, et al. The effect of increasing the supply of skilled health providers on pregnancy and birth outcomes: evidence from the Midwives Service Scheme in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):425. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1688-8.
  13. World Bank. Maternal mortality ratio (modeled estimate, per 100,000 live births) – Nigeria [Internet]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT?locations=NG
  14. Prime Minister of Kazakhstan. Modernising rural health care to increase life expectancy and social well-being [Internet]. Available from: https://primeminister.kz/en/news/modernising-rural-health-care-to-increase-life-expectancy-and-social-well-being-3010107
  15. Prime Minister of Kazakhstan. Final board: results for 2022 and tasks for coming period outlined by Ministry of Healthcare [Internet]. Available from: https://primeminister.kz/en/news/reviews/final-board-results-for-2022-and-tasks-for-coming-period-outlined-by-ministry-of-healthcare-2501554
  16. Prime Minister of Kazakhstan. Plans to commission 655 facilities under Modernisation of Rural Health Care national project planned for 2024 [Internet]. Available from: https://primeminister.kz/en/news/plans-to-commission-556-facilities-under-modernisation-of-rural-health-care-national-project-planned-for-2024-27398
  17. Тургамбаева А, Иманова Ж, Тулегенова А. Сельское здравоохранение в Казахстане: проблемы и тенденции (обзор литературы). Journal of Health Development. 2021;(43).
  18. Есимов НБ, Токмурзиева ГЖ, Измайлова НТ. Роль первичной медико-санитарной помощи в развитии здравоохранения. Вестник КазНМУ. 2017;(4):317–320.
  19. Касымова ГП, Калиева БМ. Совершенствование первичной медико-санитарной помощи населению, оказываемой врачом общей практики. Вестник КазНМУ. 2017;(4):363–365.
  20. Нургалиева ММ. Доступность и качество медицинских услуг в Казахстане. Алматы: Исследовательский институт международного и регионального сотрудничества Казахстанско-Немецкого университета; 2016. С. 60.

Мәлімдемелер

Этикалық мақұлдау
Одобрение этического комитета и информированное согласие не требовались, поскольку статья представляет собой обзор литературы и основана исключительно на ранее опубликованных и общедоступных данных.
Авторлардың үлесі
А. Танатарова - разработка концепции; проведение исследования; курирование данных; подготовка первоначального варианта рукописи. А.Е. Уалиева - разработка концепции; методология; научное руководство; рецензирование и редактирование рукописи. А.К. Турманова - проведение исследования; валидация; рецензирование и редактирование рукописи.
Мүдделер қақтығысы
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов.
Қаржыландыру
Исследование не получало внешнего финансирования.
Деректердің қолжетімділігі
Все данные, рассматриваемые в статье, получены из источников, представленных в списке литературы.

Дәйексөз келтіру

Tanatarova A., Ualieva A.E., Turmanova A.K.. Improvement of outpatient medical care for the rural population. Review. Scientific and Practical Journal «Medicine, Science and Education». 2025;(3):106-114. DOI: 10.24412/1609-8692-2025-3-68-75.

CC BY Мақала келесі лицензия шарттарымен қолжетімді CC BY 4.0.